Legal Opinion

State v. Wesenberg

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1984No. C1-84-582PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

This is a sentencing appeal. Defendant was placed on probation for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. He subsequently committed a burglary and was sentenced to prison. The trial judge denied defendant’s timely request to have his probationary sentence executed concurrent with the prison term for burglary. We reverse.

FACTS

On April 11, 1983, appellant pled guilty in Benton County to unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. Imposition of sentence was stayed for three years, defendant was placed on probation for three years, in keeping with the sentencing guidelines.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. SutherlinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. MurtoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. RoeschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API