Legal Opinion

State v. Cicenia

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 5, 1951PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Vanderbilt, C. J.

The facts of this case are simple. The ■defendants Cicenia, Corvino and DeMasi were indicted for murder. Before trial Cicenia applied for an inspection of .alleged .confessions made by himself and his codefendants and for an order suppressing his own confession on the ground that it had been obtained while he was under arrest without .a complaint or warrant having been made against him, with■out his having been advised of his constitutional rights, and .after he had been denied counsel for seven hours while he was being interrogated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re FriedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  3. State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cicenia v. LagaySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Powell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. CookSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Sadler v. LackeyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
  5. State v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1956

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API