Legal Opinion

Salladino v. Patrolman Brooks 4035

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1984No. 3067PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, Judge:

This matter comes before us on direct appeal from the entry of a compulsory non-suit by the Honorable Ned L. Hirsh in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County on October 27, 1981 when appellants Frank, Michael and Florence Salladino failed to appear at the trial of their trespass action against Patrolmen Brooks and Conrad, two police officers employed by the City of Philadelphia. Appellants have presented one question for us on review and we limit our review to the question of whether the trial judge abused his discretion in granting appellee/defendant’s request for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. Jewish Hosp. Assn. of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Laubach v. HaighSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Tolbert v. GilletteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Ritter, Todd & HaayenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Richards v. SwiftSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. RudensteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Jones v. RudensteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API