United States v. Baltimore Post Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
SOPEE, District Judge.
The Baltimore Post Company is indicted for violation of Revised Statutes, § 3167 (Comp. St. § 5887), as re-enacted by section 1018 of the Revenue Act of June 2, 1924 (43 Stat. 253 and 254).
The indictment is in five similar counts. The first count charges that on March 15, 1924, the income return of one J. Cookman Boyd was made to the collector of internal revenue at Baltimore, showing, among oth*762er things, the amount of the tax due to the United States for the year 1923 to be $150.65; that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined that said sum was the amount of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Hawaii v. MankichiSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reimel v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Providence Journal Co. v. McCoyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1950
- City of Plainfield v. Courier-News & Daily JournalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974