Legal Opinion
Porter v. Division of Employment Security
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 2010No. ED 93933PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARY K. HOFF, Judge.
Deanna Porter (Claimant) appeals pro se from a final order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The Commission’s order affirmed the Division of Employment Security Appeals Tribunal’s decision denying Claimant unemployment compensation benefits. Because Claimant’s brief fails to substantially comply with the appellate briefing requirements as provided by Rule 84.04 1 we dismiss the appeal.
Pro se appellants are held to the same standard as licensed attorneys. Blakey v. AAA Professional Pest Control, 219 S.W.3d 792, 794 (Mo.App. E.D.2007). Hence, pro se…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. Buffalo Lodging AssociatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Kuenz v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Thornton v. City of KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Blakey v. AAA Professional Pest Control, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gant v. Lou Fusz Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
3Cited by10 opinions
- CHARLES BRANNUM and CHRIS BROWNING, and CSE ENTERPRISES, LLC v. CITY OF POPLAR BLUFF, MISSOURI, Defendant/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Biersmith v. Curry Ass'n Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Dr. Patt McGuire v. Jerry Edwards, Scott Briete, St. Louis County, State of Missouri, Office of the State Court Administrator, and Genevieve FrankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Hubbard v. Schaefer Autobody Ctrs., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Aziz v. TsevisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.