Legal Opinion

Hinrichsen v. Hinrichsen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1898PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Logan county; the Hon. George W. Herdman, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The only question in this case is whether plaintiffs in error, Irl E. Hinrichsen and Florence I. Hinrichsen, have any interest, by virtue of the will of their grandfather, Michael Hinrichsen, in the property described in the eighth clause of said will. Michael Hinrichsen died October 18, 1882, and by the fifth clause of his will devised to his son Solomon Hinrichsen, for life, with remainder in fee to the heirs of his body, a farm of 388.35 acres, subject to an annual charge of §400 to be paid to the testator’s widow, Eliza Hinrichsen, during her life. By the sixth clause he devised in like…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scofield v. OlcottIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lachenmyer v. GehlbachIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Smith v. ChesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Sharp v. SharpIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Garrett v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Southwestern Oil Co. v. McDanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API