Legal Opinion

Southwestern Oil Co. v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1918No. 9362PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Noble County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by C. S. McDaniejl and C. E. McDaniel against the Southwestern Oil Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

Plaintiffs, who wejre lessors, sought to set aside an oil and gas mining lease executed to defendant, on the ground of alleged failure upon the part of the lessee to comply with the terms thereof. The lease was for a cash bonus of $1, paid upon its execution and delivery, and in addition to the usual covenants the lessee agreed to commence a test well within five milqs of the leased premises before September 1,1912, and also agreed to commence a well on the premises leased within two years of said date, or thereafter pay to the lessors the sum of $24 per annum for any further delay. A well…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Lewis v. Ocean Navigation & Pier Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Northwestern Oil & Gas Co. v. BranineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Carper v. United Fuel Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Gradle v. WarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Berthelote v. Loy Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Nadeau v. Texas CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Phoenix Oil Co. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Central States Production Corp. v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Maud Oil & Gas Co. v. BodkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API