Sandvick v. LaCrosse
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Monte Sandvick and Joedy Bragg appeal the district court judgment dismissing their lawsuit against William LaCrosse and Frank Haughton following a bench trial in which the court found neither a partnership nor a joint venture existed between the parties in regard to oil and gas leases held by the parties. We reverse and remand, concluding on the basis of the facts found by the district court that there was a joint venture and that LaCrosse and Haughton breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty to Sandvick and Bragg.
I
[¶ 2] In May 1996, Sandvick, Bragg, LaCrosse, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Reynolds-Rexwinkle Oil, Inc. v. Petex, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Grynberg v. Dome Petroleum Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- J.P. v. Stark County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Estate of ZimmermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Red River Wings, Inc. v. Hoot, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Border Resources, LLC v. Irish Oil & Gas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Valentina Williston, LLC v. Gadeco, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Knudson v. KylloNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Pifer v. McDermottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.