Grynberg v. Dome Petroleum Corp.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Jack J. Grynberg and Jack Gryn-berg and Associates (“Grynberg”) appealed from a summary judgment dismissing an action for damages against Dome Petroleum Corporation and UV Industries, Inc., for alleged overcharging in drilling oil and gas wells. We hold the trial court properly granted Dome summary judgment because the parties’ contract unambiguously said Dome’s cost statements for the wells were conclusively presumed correct unless Grynberg made a written exception and claim for adjustment within twenty-four months after the end of the calendar year in which the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lire, Inc. v. Bob's Pizza Inn Restaurants, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Willard Pease Oil & Gas Co. v. Pioneer Oil & Gas Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Mahan & Rowsey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Burlington Northern & Sante Fe Railway Co. v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Dime Box Petroleum Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Anderson v. Hess Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Border Resources, LLC v. Irish Oil & Gas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Auction Effertz, Ltd. v. SchecherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.