Legal Opinion
Paul Revere Variable Annuity Insurance v. Zang
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 3, 2001No. 00-1363, 00-1364PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
Litigation decisions made by parties have consequences. This case involves strategic decisions made by parties in an attempt to obtain a benefit from a particular ruling; when the court issued a contrary order, those parties attempted to reverse course and get the district court to reach a different result under Rule 60(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. The district court was unsympathetic, and this appeal followed. Arthur F. Zang, Jr., and Harold P. Beck joined a number of other employees in filing state employment actions against six interrelated companies, including The Paul Revere…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Bruno Lloyd v. Hovensa, LLC Wyatt, V.I., Inc. Bruno Lloyd v. Hovensa, LLC Wyatt, V.I., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Marks 3-Zet-Ernst Marks GmBh & Co. KG v. Presstek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Comfort v. Lynn School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Shervin v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Ungar v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.