Booth v. Verity, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, District Judge.
This case is brought under the Kentucky Blue Sky laws. Plaintiffs are two individual citizens of Kentucky who at one time owned stock or stock options in Verity, Inc. (“Verity”), one of the Defendants. The other defendants are the eleven individual directors 1 of Verity (“Defendant Directors”). Plaintiffs assert that Defendants’ optimistic statements to market analysts, combined with their failure to warn investors that revenues would fall short of analysts’ projections, fraudulently induced Plaintiffs to purchase Verity securities at inflated prices.
A…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ashland, Inc. v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- In Re FirstEnergy Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Barron v. VanierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Republic Bank & Trust Co. v. Bear, Stearns & Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2010
- Pharos Capital Partners, L.P. v. Deloitte & Touche, L.L.P.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.