Legal Opinion

United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Maxwell

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 20, 2004No. 1:03-cv-00064PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This enforcement action filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) involves alleged insider trading in the stock of Worthington Foods, Inc. (“Wor-thington”). The SEC alleges that Defendant, David W. Maxwell, a senior executive at Worthington, provided an illegal tip to his barber, Defendant, Elton L. Jehn, pri- or to the October 1, 1999, announcement that the Kellogg Company (“Kellogg”) had entered into an agreement to acquire Wor-thington. The SEC contends that this tip allowed Defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WhitmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API