Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Trimble

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 12, 1924No. 6 Div. 178PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J. Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

On Rehearing.

The trial was de novo in the circuit court. Wright v City of Bessemer, 209 Ala. 374, 96 So. 316. The certiorari is ruled by Thomas v. City of Mobile, 203 Ala. 96, 82 So. 110. The latter authority from this court differentiates, or is at variance with, the construction given the statute and general ordinances in question (Code 1907, § 1217) in Goldberger v. City of Mobile, 17 Ala. App. 145, 82 So. 635; Jackson v. City of Mobile, 16 Ala. App. 664, 81 So. 184; Hannibal v. City of Mobile, 16 Ala. App.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of UniontownAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Wright v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Thomas v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Hannibal v. City of MobileAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Cooper v. City of GadsdenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Casteel v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API