Ostrowsky v. Berg
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan
From a judgment striking their amended defense and counterclaim and entering judgment against them for $25,534.75, defendants appeal.
One of the defendants, Bohert Berg, an attorney practicing at the Chicago bar, represented defendants in the trial court and upon this appeal. He wrote and filed defendants ’ brief in this court, in which he stated that “the note sued on by the plaintiff in the case at bar was for the purchase of articles designed to prevent conception . . . the alleged sale of the prophylactics was contrary to public policy and the court erred in rendering judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Continental Can Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Zeigler v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Decatur Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. CrailIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Sterling-Midland Coal Co. v. Great Lakes Coal & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nutter v. BechtelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Unique Watch Crystal Co., Inc. v. KotlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
- Zerjal v. Daech & Bauer Const., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- DePhillips v. DePhillipsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Blanchard v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.