Legal Opinion
Pozzie v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 24, 1995No. 94-1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
After Diana Pozzie lost her job and defaulted on a home mortgage insured by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), she applied to have HUD accept an assignment of her mortgage and thereby prevent foreclosure. HUD rejected her application, finding that Pozzie failed to satisfy the eligibility requirement that the default not be caused by circumstances beyond her control. HUD found that Pozzie’s job loss resulted from her excessive tardiness and unauthorized overtime work. Pozzie sought judicial review, and the district court granted summary judgment in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- James and Joyce Ferrell v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (Hud)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Carroll Kisser v. Henry G. Cisneros, Secretary of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Brown v. LynnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Bradley E. Alexander, Individually and as the Assignee of Theodore E. Seifert v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pozzie v. United States Department Of Housing And Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995