Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Ottewell
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1989No. Docket 96853Published
1Opinion of the Court
174 Mich. App. 750 (1989)
436 N.W.2d 453
HICKS
v.
OTTEWELL
Docket No. 96853.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Decided February 21, 1989.
Clarence H. Ledwon, for Richard S. Ottewell, James R. Nair and Julian M. Levant.
Before: MICHAEL J. KELLY, P.J., and MAHER and M. WARSHAWSKY,[*] JJ.
M. WARSHAWSKY, J.
By leave granted, defendants Richard S. Ottewell, Julian M. Levant and James R. Nair appeal from a November 10, 1986, Oakland Circuit Court order affirming sanctions imposed by the 52nd District Court, 4th Division.
Defendants Ottewell and Levant are Oakland County attorneys. Defendant Nair is an accountant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Association Research and Development Corporation v. CNA Financial Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hicks v. OttewellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Briarwood v. Faber’s Fabrics, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.