Fitzhugh v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Case, for interference with the plaintiff’s rights by sundry acts and words, being the same action heretofore reported. 79 N. H. 371. The defendants are the Grand Trunk Railway Company, the Central Vermont Railway Company, Edson J. Chamberlin, Alfred W. Smithers and Edward C. Smith. The individual defendants are non-residents. After the former decision, the trustees’ disclosures were taken and showed large sums due.
Read the full summary
Case, for interference with the plaintiff’s rights by sundry acts and words, being the same action heretofore reported. 79 N. H. 371. The defendants are the Grand Trunk Railway Company, the Central Vermont Railway Company, Edson J. Chamberlin, Alfred W. Smithers and Edward C. Smith. The individual defendants are non-residents. After the former decision, the trustees’ disclosures were taken and showed large sums due. Orders of notice were issued, and upon the return day each individual defendant filed a special appearance, stated to be for the sole purpose of protecting the party’s rights in…
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.
1. The defendants’ demurrers and motions to dismiss are based upon the same ground. The claim is that there is a misjoinder of defendants. Upon the defendants’ motion, the declaration has been amplified by more particular statements of the acts relied upon by the plaintiff, and the demurrers relate to the declaration in its present form. The first of these statements charges that “On the twenty-third day of January, 1913, the said defendants Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, by its president, and the Central Vermont Railway Company, by its chairman of its .board of directors, Edson J.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Owen v. WestonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
- Stevens v. RoweSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. SargentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
- Connecticut Valley Lumber Co. v. MonroeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
- Patten v. PattenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Town of Hooksett School District v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1984
- Lemire v. HaleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
- ATHR, Inc. v. NoltDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- Decker v. Decker, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
- Worthen v. KingsburySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930