Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Maxey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 24, 1925No. 15456PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The plaintiffs in error were the defendants below, and the defendant in error was the plaintiff. The parties will be referred to Herein as plaintiff and defendants as they appeared in the trial court.

Th^ plaintiff brought action against the defendants for -.the sum of $1,500, as commission claimed to have been earned by him as a lease broker in the employ of thq defendants, in procuring leases for them, and payment, of which was refused upon demand, and which is due and owing. Thej defendants answered separately by general denial.

The cause was called for trial on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Treese v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Fitch v. BraddockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Bohnefeld v. WahlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Downey v. BroesamleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sides v. John Cordes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Simons v. Brashears Transfer and StorageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. First State Bank of Noble v. McKiddySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Retail Merchants Ass'n v. PetermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. McCormick v. StonebrakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API