Legal Opinion
Perry v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided October 19, 1994No. Civ. 1:94cv-113PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant Norfolk and Western Railway Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). However, Rule 56(c) is not a requirement that the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MAYNARD BY MAYNARD v. Indiana Harbor Belt R. Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Olaniyan Ex Rel. Estate of Olaniyan v. CSX TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006