State v. Lindsey A.F.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 1. The petitioner, State of Wisconsin, seeks review of a published court of appeals decision that affirmed two orders of the circuit court, dismissing delinquency petitions against Lindsey A.F. The State asserts that because the juvenile was not in custody, the circuit court lacked authority to dismiss the first petition and refer the matter for deferred prosecution. Further, the State argues that even if the circuit court had such authority, it erred when it concluded that the district attorney could not terminate the court ordered deferred prosecution by the filing of a second petition.
¶…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. La Crosse Tribune v. Circuit Court for La Crosse CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. LeitnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. Hezzie R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Wisconsin Valley Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SmetCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- State v. Raheem MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Noffke Ex Rel. Swenson v. BakkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- State v. C.G.B.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
- State v. Raheem MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.