Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. King

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 22, 1993No. 1 CA-CR 92-0702Published

1DissentLankford, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The issue is whether the superior court violated AR.S. section 13-702(D) by relying on an improper factor in imposing an aggravated sentence. The superior court stated that it relied in part on a stipulation regarding the sentence as justifying a greater punishment than the statutory presumptive sentence. However, a stipulation between the prosecutor and defendant is not a proper aggravating factor under AR.S. section 13-702(D). This matter therefore should be remanded for resentencing.

The sentencing stipulation is part of a plea agreement in which defendant agreed to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. JustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. State v. OjedaArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. ThurlowArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. HolstunCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. State v. HolstunCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API