State v. King
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentLankford, Judge
I respectfully dissent. The issue is whether the superior court violated AR.S. section 13-702(D) by relying on an improper factor in imposing an aggravated sentence. The superior court stated that it relied in part on a stipulation regarding the sentence as justifying a greater punishment than the statutory presumptive sentence. However, a stipulation between the prosecutor and defendant is not a proper aggravating factor under AR.S. section 13-702(D). This matter therefore should be remanded for resentencing.
The sentencing stipulation is part of a plea agreement in which defendant agreed to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. JustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. OjedaArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. ThurlowArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HolstunCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. HolstunCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.