Legal Opinion
Dominique Lopez v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Company, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 20, 2026No. 4:24-cv-03573Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DOMINIQUE LOPEZ, Case No. 24-cv-03573-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 58 10 MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court are Defendants Mead Johnson Nutrition Company and Mead 14 Johnson & Company, LLC’s (collectively “Defendants” or “Mead”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s 15 amended complaint. Dkt. No. 58. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without 16 oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.