Legal Opinion

Howell v. Cooper

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

During the late unpleasantness sometimes called the “ Ute War,” one Moses L. Howell furnished the military authorities of the state with 26 horses, which were used in repelling the invasion of the hostile tribe. The horses were delivered under what is called in the pleading a “contract” which was executed by Howell on his own behalf, and by Chapman, an assistant adjutant general, who assumed to act for the state. The state exercised the option granted by the vendor, bought the horses, and paid for them. The paper contained a clause which substantially provided that, if the state should use…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Bryan v. CattellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Magruder v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  5. Greenwood Cemetery Land Co. v. RouttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keefe Manufacturing & Investment Co. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API