Legal Opinion

White v. Husky Oil Co.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided April 5, 1967No. Civ. No. 576PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMESON, Chief Judge.

The defendant Husky Oil Company has moved for summary judgment, contending that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that under the well settled law of Montana Husky is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiffs resist the motion, contending that under the facts and inferences which may be drawn therefrom a jury issue is presented. Both sides have filed briefs and supplemental briefs.

The plaintiffs were passengers in an automobile which stopped for servicing at a filling station in Laurel, Montana, owned by the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. TaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  2. DuVall v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API