Legal Opinion

Titan Enterprises, Inc. v. Armo Construction, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1973No. Civ. 40624PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, J.

This action involves a dispute between a subcontractor (Titan Enterprises, hereinafter referred to as “petitioner”) and a general contractor (Anno Construction, hereinafter referred to as “respondent”), over alleged nonpayment for work, done on a hospital building pursuant to a written contract. The dispute before us involves only a procedural issue—namely was that dispute properly submitted to and determined by arbitration? The trial court held that it was; we disagree.

The construction contracts between the parties contained an arbitration clause. That clause was of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Case v. Kadota Fig Ass'n of ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Lesser Towers, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Bertero v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Berman v. Renart Sportswear Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Case v. Kadota Fig Assn.California Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Cordillera Corp. v. HeardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Atlas Plastering, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Cordillera Corp. v. HeardColorado Court of Appeals · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API