Legal Opinion

Hendrix v. Toledious

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 14, 1949No. 32677, 32678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.

The following appears on the bill of exceptions in each of these cases: “To Nick Toledious and Harris and Harris, his attorneys of record: Gentlemen: You are hereby notified that we are presenting as statement to the Judge of the Floyd Superior Court the foregoing bill of exceptions for approval in said case as provided by law.” This notice is signed by Chas. W. Anderson and John S. Boswell as attorneys for the plaintiff in error. Underneath this notice in each case is the following: “As due and legal service, the foregoing notice is hereby acknowledged and copy received. This 11th day of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mauldin v. MauldinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Harper v. Atlanta West Point Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Salvation Army v. Eleventh Hour Service Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Stepp v. North Georgia Feed Fertilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strickland Motors Inc. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Castleberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Hall Motors Inc. v. Decatur Lincoln Mercury Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API