Legal Opinion

Strickland Motors Inc. v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1951No. 33765PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.

“The law relative • to notice to the opposing party or counsel before certification of a bill of exceptions, or a waiver of such notice, or approval of the averments of fact in a bill of exceptions, did not alter or change the requirements under existing law relative to service, waiver of service, or acknowledgment of service of a bill of exceptions, and there being in this case no return of service of the bill of exceptions upon the defendant in error indorsed upon or annexed to the bill of exceptions, and no waiver of such service or acknowledgment thereof appearing, this court is without…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Salvation Army v. Eleventh Hour Service Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Henry v. GillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Stepp v. North Georgia Feed Fertilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Godwin v. Atlantic Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. Hendrix v. TolediousCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Riegel Textile Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Cape v. American Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API