Legal Opinion
Leavy v. Kramer
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1962PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ ohm F. Scileppi, J.
In an action to recover damages for the alleged- malpractice by a certain attorney in the prosecution of a lawsuit, the plaintiff moves to vacate the defendants’ demand for a bill of particulars. The plaintiff contends that the entire demand is improper since it requests particulars *480concerning ilie alleged canse of action which, the defendants’ attorney was negligent in prosecuting.
In McAleenan v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. (232 N. Y. 199) the court stated, at pages 204-205, that: “ one who seeks to hold another responsible for neglect in the conduct of litigation must show that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vooth v. . McEachenNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- McAleenan v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Schmitt v. McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Hamilton v. DannenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Lamprecht v. BienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDow v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Titsworth v. MondoNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Taylor Oil Co. v. WeisenseeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- McKenna v. Forsyth & ForsythAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Fernandes v. BarrsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.