Legal Opinion

Government Employees Insurance v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 12, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-4026PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DEBEVOISE, District Judge:

This matter is before the court on the motion of plaintiff, the Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”), for summary judgment; the cross-motion of defendant United States to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and the cross-motions of defendants United States and Richard and Karen Kozel for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment are granted.

I have consolidated Kozel v. Dunne, 678 F.Supp. 450 No. 87-3336 (D.N.J.) with the present action. Many of the facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Sound Ship Building Corp v. Bethlehem Steel Company (Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Gilborges v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw, Incorporated v. Rexnord, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carter v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  2. GNOC CORP. v. AboudDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  3. Mannes v. HealeyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Rogers v. JordanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  5. Carter v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API