Government Employees Insurance v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEBEVOISE, District Judge:
This matter is before the court on the motion of plaintiff, the Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”), for summary judgment; the cross-motion of defendant United States to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and the cross-motions of defendants United States and Richard and Karen Kozel for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment are granted.
I have consolidated Kozel v. Dunne, 678 F.Supp. 450 No. 87-3336 (D.N.J.) with the present action. Many of the facts…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Sound Ship Building Corp v. Bethlehem Steel Company (Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Gilborges v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw, Incorporated v. Rexnord, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carter v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- GNOC CORP. v. AboudDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Mannes v. HealeyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Rogers v. JordanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Carter v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003