Sterling Dickens v. Bill Armontrout
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Sterling Dickens appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) for failure to exhaust state remedies. Dickens v. Armontrout, No. 89-2108C(6) (E.D.Mo. Oct. 3, 1990) {Dickens ) (order). For reversal, Dickens argues that he has exhausted his remedies under Missouri law. For the reasons stated below, we reverse and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
In 1982, Dickens…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hampton v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- State v. DickensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dickens v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harold Lee Duvall v. James D. PurkettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Cox v. NorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996
- Sterling Dickens v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993