Legal Opinion

Sterling Dickens v. Bill Armontrout

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 20, 1991No. 90-2860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

Sterling Dickens appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) for failure to exhaust state remedies. Dickens v. Armontrout, No. 89-2108C(6) (E.D.Mo. Oct. 3, 1990) {Dickens ) (order). For reversal, Dickens argues that he has exhausted his remedies under Missouri law. For the reasons stated below, we reverse and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

In 1982, Dickens…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hampton v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  2. State v. DickensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Dickens v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harold Lee Duvall v. James D. PurkettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. Cox v. NorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996
  3. Sterling Dickens v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API