Legal Opinion

Harold Lee Duvall v. James D. Purkett

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1994No. 93-1778PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOKEN, Circuit Judge.

This case again raises issues of exhaustion of state remedies and procedural default when a Missouri inmate seeks federal habeas corpus relief without having filed a post-conviction motion under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035. We now have the benefit of a significant clarification of Missouri law on this subject. See Simmons v. White, 866 S.W.2d 443 (Mo.Sup.Ct.1993).

In December 1989, Harold Lee Duvall pleaded guilty to charges of selling marijuana. His plea agreement, as he explained it to the trial judge at his change-of-plea hearing, provided that Duvall would be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Reed v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Paul Sloan v. Paul Delo, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Alan Jeffrey Bannister v. Paul K. DeloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. Clay v. DormireSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. DAMEION ROBINSON v. DAVID CRIST, WARDEN, MCF — STILLWATERCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. Clarence Victor v. Frank X. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API