Legal Opinion

State v. St. Pierre

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1988No. 51690-1PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Utter, J. —

Christopher St. Pierre seeks reversal of his convictions for first degree felony murder of Damon Wells and aggravated first degree murder of John Achord. The central issue in both convictions is whether the trial court denied St. Pierre's right of confrontation under the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution by admitting the out-of-court statements made by codefendants, Andrew Webb and the defendant's brother, Paul. Finding the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights to have been violated in one case but not the other, we affirm the conviction for the first degree felony…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. Matter of Personal Restraint of St. PierreWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1999

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API