Legal Opinion
Cook v. Heinbaugh
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided September 21, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.
Heinbaugh made a contract with Cook and thé. G-rande Avenue Land Company, by which he was to ’furnish material for the construction of a residence for the sum of $5,050. To guarantee the performance of- his contract, he furnished to them the -bond o.f the United States • Fidelity & Guaranty Company. Among the provisions of said bond is the following:
“In no event shall.the surety be * * * subject to any suit, action or proceeding thereon, that is instituted later than the first day of September, A. D. 1923.”’
Heinbaugh defaulted on his contract, and the building was not .completed by July 1st,-…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lamb v. Powder River Live Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Benton County Savings Bank of Norway v. BoddickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Ellis v. Council Bluffs InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Stout v. City Fire Insurance Co. of New HavenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Camelot Excavating Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Douglass v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Ryan v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Page County v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- American Surety Co. v. Broadway Improvement & Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.