Legal Opinion
Harlan County v. Brock
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided December 9, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Dietzman
—Reversing.
Chapter 133 of the Acts of 1932, now section 125a-4 el seq. of the 1932 Supplement to Carroll’s 1930 Edition of the Kentucky Statutes, in section 1 provides:
“That in all Judicial Districts, composed of two counties and having a population of 100,000 or more, according to the Federal Census of 1930, there is hereby created, the office of District Detective, to the Commonwealth’s Attorney.” (Italics ours.)
The rest of the act provides for the method of appointment and the powers, duties, and compensation of such district detective. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. West v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- State ex rel. Wiles v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Campbell v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Hatfield v. GarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Fleming v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martin v. TollefsonWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- City of Covington v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
- Monticello Co. v. Commonwealth, Natural Resources & Environmental Protection CabinetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993
- Brock v. Harlan CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934