Legal Opinion
Heathman v. Heathman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 14, 1990No. A8812-07108; CA A60454Published
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Plaintiff (husband) appeals from the judgment dismissing his complaint on the ground that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendant (wife). ORCP 21A(2). We reverse.
The parties’ marriage was dissolved in Multnomah County in 1983. The decree of dissolution incorporated their property settlement agreement. A dispute later arose about the interpretation of the agreement, and wife, who had moved to Florida, brought an action against husband in Multnomah County. See Heathman and Heathman, 94 Or App 223, 764 P2d 966 (1988). The trial court held that husband owed wife $18,846.50. Husband…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State Ex Rel. White Lumber Sales, Inc. v. SulmonettiOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. La Manufacture Francaise Des Pneumatiques Michelin v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- North Pacific Steamship Co. v. GuariscoOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In re the Marriage of O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.