Legal Opinion
Nilsen v. City of LaGrange
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 7, 1937No. 26178PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. “The filing of the bond, or making of the pauper affidavit, required under the act approved December 10, 1902 (Acts 1902, p. 105) [Code, § 19-214], relating to a certiorari sued out to review the judgment of a municipal court is a condition precedent to the application for certiorari; and a distinct averment in the petition for certiorari that the bond has been filed or the affidavit made is essential to the validity of the petition. Johns v. Tifton, 122 Ga. 734 (50 S. E. 941). The failure to aver in the petition for certiorari that the bond has been filed or the affidavit made renders the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gillespie v. Mayor of MaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Citizens Banking Co. v. ParisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Dykes v. Twiggs CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Hamilton & Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Johns v. City of TiftonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ronemous v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Ellett v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Sauceman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Bickers v. Georgia Real Estate CommissionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- West v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.