Legal Opinion

Levitch v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we reach the following conclusions:

1. We think the learned justice at Special Term was right in denying plaintiff’s motion for -summary judgment. The answer presented issues upon which defendant was entitled to a trial.

2. As to the dismissal of the amended complaint upon the ground that it did not state a cause of action: While we disagree with the learned Special Term in its conclusion that the plaintiff could be removed from her employment except for cause and after a hearing (Education Law, § 872, subd. 3), we think plaintiff could not maintain this action for salary for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bullock v. . CooleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Walters v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Walters v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Levitch v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. State ex rel. Tracy v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API