Legal Opinion
Moore v. City of San Jose
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1980No. Nos. 77-2874, 77-3087PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
These are appeals from a judgment of the district court approving as “fair, reasonable and adequate” a settlement agreement (the Agreement) between the fourteen named plaintiffs (the Assistant Policewomen) and the original defendant, the City of San Jose, but opposed by the intervenor, the San Jose Peace Officers’ Association (the Association), and dismissing all claims by the Assistant Policewomen against the Association and all cross claims by the Association against San Jose. In No. 77-3087, the Assistant Policewomen attack the district court’s dismissal of their…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1473, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,064 the Officers for Justice, and Jesse J. Byrd v. The Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, United States of America v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Williams v. VukovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Georgevich v. StraussCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- 24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1563, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,401 Anne Owens v. Joseph F. RushCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.