Legal Opinion
(PC) Cyprian v. Constable
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 14, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00689Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 REALIOUS CYPRIAN, No. 2:19-cv-0689 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 T. CONSTABLE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983
and 18 has requested authority pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915
to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 19 2. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 20
636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff has also requested the appointment of counsel. See ECF No. 1 at 6. 21 For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.