Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1901No. 19,539PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Madison. Circuit Court; John F. McClure, Judge. From a conviction of larceny, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Appellant was convicted of petit larceny. He complains that he was denied the right of trial hy jury. The record recites that on the 24th day of November, the cause, by agreement of counsel, was set down for trial by the court on November 26th; that on November 26th “the defendant now demands a trial by jury” which was overruled, and the cause submitted to the court for trial.

To sustain his appeal it is required of appellant to bring to this court a record which affirmatively shows that prejudicial error has been committed against him. Campbell v. State, 148 Ind. 527; Riley v. State, 149 Ind.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. CheekIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Campbell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hauser v. RothIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Oats v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Naanes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Williams v. HertU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1901
  3. Shriner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API