Legal Opinion

Smith v. Stokes

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 27, 2001No. Nos. 2000-CA-000352-MR, 2000-CA-000424-MRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TACKETT, Judge:

Frank and Emily Smith appeal the judgment of the Harlan Circuit Court finding that they falsely imprisoned James Stokes and awarding him damages for the same. Stokes and his wife, Bertha, also appeal the judgment claiming that the damages awarded were insufficient and that the circuit court improperly established a boundary between their property and that of the Smiths. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

In August 1993, the Stokeses and the Smiths were embroiled in a land dispute concerning the boundaries of their respective properties. While this matter was pending…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Raine v. DrasinKentucky Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Roberts v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Creech v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  4. Rader v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  5. SuperX Drugs of Kentucky, Inc. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fultz v. WhittakerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
  2. Albin v. Louisville Metro GovernmentDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
  3. Curtis v. SumerallDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023
  4. McIlwain v. DoddDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
  5. McMillen v. WindhamDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API