People v. Tameka C.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
When a defendant commits an assault with a firearm upon an intended victim, and with the same shot injures an unintended victim, thereby committing another assault, may the sentence for each assault be enhanced by a separate firearm-use enhancement? We conclude the sentence may be so enhanced.
I
On the evening of March 1, 1994, an altercation broke out between defendant Tameka C. and Eddie Stansberry. Stansberry struck defendant in the face. Defendant left the scene and returned shortly thereafter with a *192firearm. She shot Stansberry in the buttocks. Three police officers who…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. FierroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. ColantuonoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- In re CulbrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. OatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. AhmedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. BrimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.