Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Jessica Morrill

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 10, 2017No. 2015-0377Published

1ConcurrenceHicks, J.

The majority applies the three-part test we articulated in State v. McKinnon-Andrews, 151 N.H. 19, 25 (2004), for determining whether a police officer’s questioning exceeds the scope of a lawful traffic stop. Applying this test, the majority holds that McAulay impermissibly expanded the scope of the traffic stop by requesting a canine unit to perform a sniff of the vehicle. While I agree with the majority that the evidence obtained as a result of the subsequent consent search must be suppressed, I write separately because I would apply the third prong of the McKinnon-Andrews test differently…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Viveros v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. State v. McKinnon-AndrewsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. State of New Hampshire v. Hillman Blesdell-MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API