Legal Opinion

Viveros v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 26, 1992No. 1238-90PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine and sentenced to ten years confinement, probated for seven years. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction, finding that the trial court erred in failing to suppress the evidence. Viveros v. State, 799 S.W.2d 458 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990). The District Attorney (DA) and the State Prosecuting Attorney (SPA) have each filed petitions for discretionary review. Ground one of the DA’s petition and ground four of the SPA’s petition allege that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Viveros v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991

4Cited by116 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Klare v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  3. Sieffert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  4. Woods v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  5. Trahan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API