Viveros v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine and sentenced to ten years confinement, probated for seven years. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction, finding that the trial court erred in failing to suppress the evidence. Viveros v. State, 799 S.W.2d 458 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990). The District Attorney (DA) and the State Prosecuting Attorney (SPA) have each filed petitions for discretionary review. Ground one of the DA’s petition and ground four of the SPA’s petition allege that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Viveros v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
4Cited by116 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Klare v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Sieffert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
- Woods v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Trahan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.