Legal Opinion
Peek v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 6, 2000No. S99G0592Published
1Opinion of the Court
527 S.E.2d 552 (2000)
272 Ga. 169
PEEK
v.
The STATE.
No. S99G0592.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
March 6, 2000.
Monte K. Davis, George A. Stein, Atlanta, for appellant
Keith C. Martin, Solicitor, Kimberly V. Gross, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.
BENHAM, Chief Justice.
Arrested and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, Earl Peek agreed to submit to a state-administered blood test. His blood was drawn by Ha Bolia, a Southern Regional Medical Center employee. At trial, the State was permitted to introduce as a business record[1] a "computer print-out" of an "employee education cumulative…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Munda v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Suarez v. SuarezSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.