Legal Opinion

Munda v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1984No. 68786PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

Appellant was tried before a jury and found guilty of violating OCGA § 40-1-3, in that he had permitted an intoxicated driver to operate an automobile. Appellant appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered on the guilty verdict.

1. An intoximeter test was given to the individual whose operation of an automobile was the basis of the criminal charges against appellant. At appellant’s trial, the State sought to introduce into evidence the results of the driver’s intoximeter test. Appellant moved to suppress this evidence on the ground of non-compliance with OCGA §…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. State v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Perano v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Gilbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Whiteley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Harden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Hodson v. MawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API