Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Daniel B.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 2019No. SC19788Published

1DissentEcker, J.

**26The majority concludes that the defendant's conversations with John Evans and the undercover "hitman," Michael Paleski, Jr., provided sufficient evidence for the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime of attempted murder. I disagree that those preliminary discussions, without more, constitute a substantial step under General Statutes § 53a-49 and, therefore, I respectfully dissent.

I

Before getting to the heart of the case, I pause to express a minor concern with the methodological framework developed by the majority as a prelude to its finding that…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Resendiz-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  4. United States v. Pamela Jones, Katresa Marie Johnson, Mark J. Scott, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. State v. GroupOhio Supreme Court · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API