State v. Daniel B.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1DissentEcker, J.
**26The majority concludes that the defendant's conversations with John Evans and the undercover "hitman," Michael Paleski, Jr., provided sufficient evidence for the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime of attempted murder. I disagree that those preliminary discussions, without more, constitute a substantial step under General Statutes § 53a-49 and, therefore, I respectfully dissent.
I
Before getting to the heart of the case, I pause to express a minor concern with the methodological framework developed by the majority as a prelude to its finding that…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Resendiz-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Pamela Jones, Katresa Marie Johnson, Mark J. Scott, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- State v. GroupOhio Supreme Court · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.