Legal Opinion · Dissent

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 1995No. 83179Published

1DissentAlma Wilson, Justice

Southwestern Bell Company (SWB) contends that it is entitled to a stay of the effectiveness of three rules or regulations of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC) pursuant to art. IX, § 21, Okla. Const.1 SWB does not challenge the rule-making process — neither the validity of the adopting order nor the gubernatorial and legislative approval. SWB does not challenge all the regulations adopted by the order which it asks this Court to stay. SWB challenges only those regulations requiring it to modernize and upgrade the central offices in some sixty sparsely populated areas of this State,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fretz v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. TWA v. McKinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Garrison v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. State Ex Rel. Henry v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. In Re Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Sun Oil Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API