Legal Opinion

Safford v. Charles

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 2, 1886PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

This is a writ of entry. The demandants’ title is by deed from one Jacobs, executed and delivered in 1878, and recorded in 1880. The tenant’s bill is under a levy and sale on execution in 1881, in a suit against Jacobs, in which the premises were attached in 1879. The demandants held an unrecorded deed when the premises were attached as the property of their grantor, and had recorded their deed before judgment and execution. The question is whether the sale on the execution is valid against them.

S. C. Bancroft, for the tenant. (r. B: Ives, for the demandants.

The ad damnum in the writ against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wren v. Hynes' administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  2. Tarbell v. JewettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Chickering v. LovejoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  4. Hichins v. LyonIllinois Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Old Colony Trust Co. v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Sullivan v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Connor v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Massasoit-Pocasset National Bank v. BordenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API