Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Puckett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 27, 1972No. 5-5812PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. Fred Jones, Justice.

Robert Puckett and Virgil Garrett were driving their respective pickup trucks in the same direction and in the same traffic lane on Asher Avenue in the City of Little Rock. Garrett was behind Puckett and when Puckett stopped to permit a vehicle to turn from the street in front of him, Garrett’s vehicle collided with the rear of Puckett’s vehicle.

Puckett sued Garrett in the Pulaski County Circuit Court for personal injury and property damage, and Garrett answered with a general denial and a counterclaim for damage to his pickup truck. Both parties alleged the usual acts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Houston v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Bowman v. GabelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Worth James Const. Co. v. FulkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Farmer v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Truck Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Stowe v. BowlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Funk v. DeaversCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Johnson v. Truck Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API